AI agents with defined responsibilities

An AI agent is useful when it has a specific job, access to the right information and clear limits. I build assistants for tasks such as finding internal information, preparing responses or coordinating a defined sequence of actions, with review where the consequences matter.

Discuss your project

When this is a good fit

For teams with a repeated information or coordination task that cannot be solved well by a simple form or fixed automation. The first question is whether an agent is needed at all, and which decisions should remain with your team.

What the work includes

  • A defined task, intended users and explicit success criteria
  • Access to approved knowledge sources and relevant integrations
  • Limited tool permissions and human approval for sensitive actions
  • Evaluation with realistic examples, including failure cases
  • Logging, usage monitoring and guidance for the people using the agent

How the project moves forward

  1. Define the task and the actions the agent may and may not perform.

  2. Prepare the knowledge sources and a representative evaluation set.

  3. Build a pilot and review accuracy, failures, latency and usage costs.

  4. Roll out to a limited group, monitor results and refine the boundaries.

Scope and investment

Pricing follows the agreed scope: pages or workflows, integrations, content, user roles and ongoing support. After reviewing the brief, I can define deliverables, dependencies and a proposal. There is no fixed price that fits every project.

Explore the work

See websites and applications in the portfolio to understand the design and implementation approach.

Explore the work

Before we start

How is an agent different from a chatbot?

A chatbot mainly answers within a conversation. An agent may also use tools or take steps in a workflow. Those capabilities need defined permissions, checks and a clear stopping point. A simpler chatbot is often the right choice when no actions are needed.

Can an agent make decisions without approval?

Only actions explicitly agreed in the project should run without review. Decisions involving payments, external communications or important record changes often need a person to approve them. The design should reflect the consequences of an incorrect action.